Jump to content

User talk:Trade

Add topic
From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Latest comment: 1 day ago by Jmabel in topic Apologies
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Trade!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 15:09, 6 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:19, 6 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Re 2: careless dog mass catting

[edit]

1. Back in March 2024 or so, you seem to have moved every image from "Puppies" to "Unidentified puppies". A large portion of these images were in breed categories already, and a good bunch had the breed in the file name. Please do not do such indiscriminate copies/moves in the future. It is not helpful if many of those changes are unneeded and wrong.

2. Around that same time, you copied many images from "Korean Jindo" to "Mixed breed dogs" without any sort of explanation in the Cat-a-lot custom edit reason. While at least one individual dog (the dark red "Cisco") is identified as a NOID East Asian type Spitz at source, this type of edit affected many other images too, and I fail to see any thoroughline in here. Please explain? --Pitke (talk) 21:56, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

Reposting since the previous time it got archived before you saw it. --Pitke (talk) 17:55, 8 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Are you serious?

[edit]

I uploaded those art covers and put the authors, claimed it was not mine, and this is the response I get??? You're an idiot. Teuku2012 (talk) 13:41, 11 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

You are not allowed to upload art covers that you do not own the rights to. Trade (talk) 13:43, 11 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Trade (talk) 03:09, 22 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Category:Invididual_YouTube_videos

[edit]
Category discussion warning

Category:Invididual_YouTube_videos has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Jarash (talk) 09:34, 22 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Category:Individual_AI-generated_images

[edit]
Category discussion warning

Individual AI-generated images has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Prototyperspective (talk) 21:24, 22 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Category:Videos_about_climate_change_and_global_warming

[edit]
Category discussion warning

Videos about climate change and global warming has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Prototyperspective (talk) 22:48, 26 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Apologies

[edit]

I see now that the text of File:Seattle - Belmont Pool Room, 1918 (44527004384).jpg (which I uploaded, but the text was verbatim from a source) refers to "holes and cracks in window, caused by stones thrown by water from broken water main". But I still don't see them, even in the higher resolution version I found and uploaded. Do you? - Jmabel ! talk 04:31, 29 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

I do but i just presumed it was an reflection Trade (talk) 05:30, 29 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
Really subtle, isn't it? I'd never have spotted it without the higher resolution. The defects in the print are more dramatic than the actual damage to the window. - Jmabel ! talk 18:33, 29 September 2025 (UTC)Reply